Robinhood Chain Weekly Recap: Pools, Stocks, DEXes

Robinhood Chain spent October 12 through October 18, 2026 in a familiar pattern: unstable new-token bursts on one side, and steadier stock-token flow in names like SPY, SPCX, and NVDA on the other. Tracked volume swung hard during the week, and by the October 19, 2026 snapshot the market had cooled, but the same structure remained in place.

Tracked volume here means the monitored pool set, not every pool on the chain. Within that tracked set, the main changes were a midweek dip, a sharp Friday spike, and continued concentration in Uniswap v4 and Uniswap v3.

Robinhood Chain volume swung, then cooled

From October 12, 2026 through October 18, 2026, tracked 24-hour volume totaled about $8.0B, or roughly $1.14B per day on average.

The path was not smooth:

• October 12: $839.8M
• October 13: $1.12B
• October 14: $1.02B
• October 15: $824.1M
• October 16: $737.9M
• October 17: $2.10B
• October 18: $1.35B

That means volume fell into October 16, 2026, then snapped higher on October 17, 2026, and stayed elevated into October 18, 2026. By the October 19, 2026 snapshot, tracked volume had cooled back to $787.4M across 231 pools, 171 tokens, and 1.28M trades.

For reference, the daily reports used for the recap are here:

• October 12, 2026
• October 13, 2026
• October 14, 2026
• October 15, 2026
• October 16, 2026
• October 17, 2026
• October 18, 2026

New pool launches dominated the headline moves

The biggest single-day moves were large enough to be misleading if read without context.

The standout gainers in the weekly window were:

• IMD6900 on October 12, 2026: +745,769.42% on $8.72M volume and $437,779 liquidity
• COVENANT on October 18, 2026: +513,364.06% on $19.01M volume and $223,909 liquidity
• DOPE on October 16, 2026: +468,532.55% on $9.85M volume and $188,844 liquidity
• INFLUENCE on October 14, 2026: +338,314.26% on $4.60M volume and $373,252 liquidity

One reading is simple: these were launch-style repricings in relatively thin markets, not organic rallies in mature pools. When a token posts a six-figure percentage change against liquidity measured in the low hundreds of thousands, the move usually says more about initial pool formation and reflexive flow than about durable price discovery.

No single meme token owned the whole week. By appearances across separate daily reports, Paper, SI, and astro each showed up on two different days between October 12 and October 18. Several others repeated within a single report, including BOOMER and TSI on October 18, and DOPE on October 16.

That weekend rotation still showed up in the October 19, 2026 snapshot. hi was still doing $8.37M in 24-hour volume in a 43-hour-old pool, and BOOMER was still doing $7.16M in a 41-hour-old pool. Those are large numbers for young pools, but they are still young pools.

SPY, SPCX, and NVDA kept stock-token flow steady

If the meme side supplied the noise, the tokenized stock side supplied the more repeatable flow. SPY, SPCX, and NVDA were the clearest examples in the October 19, 2026 snapshot.

These tokens did not lead on percentage change. They led on repeated use, deeper liquidity, and older pools.

SPY was especially important because it was not only trading against stable pairs. Its tracked pools included SPY / NVDA with $2.28M in 24-hour volume, SPY / HIMS with $1.45M, and SPY / INTC with $835,171.

The same pattern showed up elsewhere. TSLA / SPY did $1.46M, GOOGL / SPY did $691,985, and META / SPY did $609,386.

That matters because it shows Robinhood Chain’s stock-token flow is not just stablecoin in and stablecoin out. There is also meaningful cross-asset routing among the tokenized stock names themselves.

DEX rotation was concentrated, not broad

Robinhood Chain has many DEX labels in the wider ecosystem, but the tracked flow was still highly concentrated as of October 19, 2026.

The split was:

• Uniswap V4 (Robinhood): $472.5M across 158 pools
• Uniswap V3 (Robinhood): $278.8M across 41 pools
• Ramses V3 (Robinhood): $16.9M across 6 pools
• Sushiswap V3 (Robinhood): $5.5M across 1 pool
• Up V3: $4.8M across 3 pools

Uniswap v4 and Uniswap v3 together accounted for about 95% of tracked volume. So the weekly rotation was real, but it was mostly a rotation inside the two dominant venues rather than a broad migration across the whole DEX field.

Still, individual assets did move between venues. PONS is the clearest case.

The established PONS entry in the snapshot did $14.4M in 24-hour volume, but that flow was spread across multiple pools and DEXes. The single biggest tracked PONS pool was PONS / USDG 0.3% on Ramses V3, which alone did $7.79M. Other active PONS pools sat on Uniswap v4, Uniswap v3, and Up V3.

SPY showed a similar pattern. Its tracked flow was split across Uniswap v3, Uniswap v4, Ramses, and Alandale (CL), with different fee tiers and quote assets. That is a sign of venue competition, but not of fragmentation on the scale that would displace the two main Uniswap deployments.

PONS and PAPER became the handoff into October 19

The recap window ends on October 18, 2026, but the October 19, 2026 snapshot makes the next rotation clear. It moved toward PONS and PAPER, and it also exposed a practical problem: duplicate or near-duplicate names.

For PONS, the dataset shows two separate entries with the same symbol and name but different addresses.

The older, established PONS entry had:

• $14.4M in 24-hour volume
• $2.74M in liquidity in its main tracked pool
• +2.69% over 24 hours
• A pool age of 2,348 hours

A newer PONS / USDG pool had:

• $50.0M in 24-hour volume
• $91.3M in liquidity
• 57 trades
• A pool age of 2 hours

That is not a normal continuation of the same market. It is a separate contract sharing the same ticker and name. The low trade count against very large liquidity suggests initial setup or early concentrated positioning, not broad distribution.

PAPER had a similar naming issue. During the week, Paper appeared in the daily movers on October 12, 2026 with +10,323.39% and on October 15, 2026 with +945.01%. By October 19, 2026, the live snapshot showed two different similarly named assets:

• PAPER at $13.9M volume, $640,219 liquidity, +1,938.22%, pool age 3 hours
• Paper at $13.0M volume, $1.02M liquidity, +400.33%, pool age 14 hours

Those are exactly the kinds of cases where contract checks matter more than ticker checks. And because both pools were brand new, the extreme gains are best read as listing effects rather than organic rallies.

What changed, in one line

The week ended with Robinhood Chain still doing serious size, but the market structure did not really change. New pools kept producing the loudest percentage moves, tokenized stock tokens kept the steadiest repeat flow, and DEX activity stayed overwhelmingly concentrated in Uniswap v4 and Uniswap v3.

The main thing to watch after October 19, 2026 is not whether another new ticker spikes. It is whether the newest pools keep their liquidity after the first 24 to 48 hours, and whether stock-token pairs like SPY, SPCX, and NVDA keep absorbing volume while the meme rotation resets.