Top 10 Robinhood Chain tokens today: October 12, 2026
Robinhood Chain on October 12, 2026 was driven by fresh listings, with tracked 24-hour volume reaching $839.8M across 223 active pools.
Top 10 movers on Robinhood Chain
| # | Token | Price | 24h | 7d | 24h volume | Liquidity | Trades | Pool age | DEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  IMD6900Identity.md 6900 | $0.01912 | +745,769% | — | $8.72M | $437,779 | 21,442 | 7h | Uniswap V3 |
| 2 |  PaperPapertrade | $0.01042 | +10,323% | — | $11.67M | $247,094 | 5,837 | 5h | Uniswap V4 |
| 3 | FREELUCIAFreeLucia | $0.000831 | +9,030% | — | $979,736 | $81,667 | 1,711 | 3h | Uniswap V4 |
| 4 | NOCKAINock AI | $0.0058 | +7,130% | — | $9.03M | $242,795 | 12,385 | 5h | Uniswap V3 |
| 5 | CBARACASHBARA | $0.0000155 | +5,862% | — | $14.23M | $177,402 | 16,917 | 6h | Uniswap V4 |
| 6 | TFDCATThe Fund Cat | $0.0000107 | +3,091% | — | $5.87M | $159,398 | 5,194 | 2h | Uniswap V4 |
| 7 |  WISPWisp | $0.01366 | +2,733% | — | $10.75M | $368,524 | 19,858 | 8h | Uniswap V3 |
| 8 |  CLAUDIAClaudia | $0.01668 | +2,361% | — | $8.27M | $403,964 | 14,321 | 17h | Uniswap V3 |
| 9 |  SIsmoking Inu SI | $0.000099 | +1,848% | — | $8.2M | $29,226 | 10,639 | 7h | Uniswap V3 |
| 10 |  astroastronaut | $0.000566 | +1,667% | −63.5% | $637,506 | $49,457 | 766 | 5w | Uniswap V2 |
Data from GeckoTerminal, captured at 18:47 UTC on October 12, 2026. Volume and trades are summed across each token's tracked pools; price, liquidity and pool age come from its deepest pool. Only tokens with at least $10k liquidity and 100 trades in 24 hours qualify.
Token by token: what happened and possible catalysts
1IMD6900 Identity.md 6900+745,769%
$0.01912 · vol $8.72M · liq $437,779 · 21,442 trades (6,055 buyers / 4,739 sellers) · mcap $18.45M
IMD6900 rose 745,769.42% in 24 hours on $8.7M in volume, with 6,055 buyers versus 4,739 sellers and $437.8k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: current project pages show IMD6900 is active on Robinhood Chain, but research found no dated catalyst in the last 7 days, so this reads mainly as a listing effect in a 7-hour-old pool rather than an organic rally. Risk: the pool is only 7 hours old, so price discovery is still unstable.
2Paper Papertrade+10,323%
$0.01042 · vol $11.67M · liq $247,094 · 5,837 trades (209 buyers / 200 sellers) · mcap $10.42M
Paper rose 10,323.39% in 24 hours on $11.7M in volume, with 209 buyers versus 200 sellers and $247.1k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: Blockscout and market pages suggest a very recent launch, which is the most credible explanation for the move and makes it look more like a listing effect than a mature uptrend. Risk: the pool is only 5 hours old, so early price action can reverse quickly.
3FREELUCIA FreeLucia+9,030%
$0.000831 · vol $979,736 · liq $81,667 · 1,711 trades (447 buyers / 399 sellers) · mcap $762,861
FREELUCIA rose 9,030.5% in 24 hours on $979.7k in volume, with 447 buyers versus 399 sellers and $81.7k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the best on-chain reading is a brand-new 3-hour-old pool drawing short-term flow with fairly balanced participation. Risk: the pool is only 3 hours old, so extreme percentage gains should be treated as listing effects.
4NOCKAI Nock AI+7,130%
$0.0058 · vol $9.03M · liq $242,795 · 12,385 trades (5,250 buyers / 2,325 sellers) · mcap $5.92M
NOCKAI rose 7,129.85% in 24 hours on $9.0M in volume, with 5,250 buyers versus 2,325 sellers and $242.8k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: the official site frames NockAI around Robinhood Chain, but research found no dated announcement in the last 7 days, so the cleaner explanation is heavy launch-day trading in a new pool. Risk: the pool is only 5 hours old, so this move is better read as a listing effect than an organic rally.
5CBARA CASHBARA+5,862%
$0.0000155 · vol $14.23M · liq $177,402 · 16,917 trades (4,066 buyers / 3,447 sellers) · mcap $1.55M
CBARA rose 5,862.45% in 24 hours on $14.2M in volume, with 4,066 buyers versus 3,447 sellers and $177.4k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, and the appearance of a second USDG pool with only one trade points more to early listing setup and fast rotation than to a confirmed project catalyst. Risk: the pool is only 6 hours old, so slippage and reversals remain high.
6TFDCAT The Fund Cat+3,091%
$0.0000107 · vol $5.87M · liq $159,398 · 5,194 trades (1,954 buyers / 1,294 sellers) · mcap $1.42M
TFDCAT rose 3,090.93% in 24 hours on $5.9M in volume, with 1,954 buyers versus 1,294 sellers and $159.4k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the strongest explanation is meme-driven launch trading in a 2-hour-old pool rather than a fundamental reprice. Risk: the pool is only 2 hours old, so the percentage move is a listing effect and carries very high volatility.
7WISP Wisp+2,733%
$0.01366 · vol $10.75M · liq $368,524 · 19,858 trades (5,218 buyers / 2,131 sellers) · mcap $14.08M
WISP rose 2,733.36% in 24 hours on $10.7M in volume, with 5,218 buyers versus 2,131 sellers and $368.5k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: project materials describe an agentic-finance angle on Robinhood Chain and research ties WISP to Spritehood, but no fresh dated catalyst was found, so strong buy-side flow in a new pool is the simpler explanation. Risk: the pool is only 8 hours old, so headline gains may not hold once early traders exit.
8CLAUDIA Claudia+2,361%
$0.01668 · vol $8.27M · liq $403,964 · 14,321 trades (3,123 buyers / 2,340 sellers) · mcap $15.41M
CLAUDIA rose 2,361.29% in 24 hours on $8.3M in volume, with 3,123 buyers versus 2,340 sellers and $404.0k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: research found active market pages and social accounts but no specific dated announcement in the last 7 days, so this looks like continued launch trading and attention rather than a confirmed new catalyst. Risk: the pool is only 17 hours old, so the move is still in the listing-effect window.
9SI smoking Inu SI+1,848%
$0.000099 · vol $8.2M · liq $29,226 · 10,639 trades (3,086 buyers / 1,862 sellers) · mcap $80,570
SI rose 1,847.86% in 24 hours on $8.2M in volume, with 3,086 buyers versus 1,862 sellers and only $29.2k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: trackers and marketplace pages show the project is active, but no dated last-7-days catalyst was found, and the 7-hour-old pool suggests a listing effect rather than a settled trend. Risk: liquidity is only $29.2k and the pool is 7 hours old, so slippage and sharp reversals can be severe.
10astro astronaut+1,667%
$0.000566 · vol $637,506 · liq $49,457 · 766 trades (319 buyers / 2 sellers) · mcap $92,496
astro rose 1,667.1% in 24 hours on $637.5k in volume, with 319 buyers versus 2 sellers and $49.5k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: the project has its own site and social presence on Robinhood Chain, but no fresh dated catalyst was found, so the buyer-heavy flow may reflect thin trading more than broad adoption. Risk: liquidity is only $49.5k, so even modest orders can move the price hard.
Robinhood Chain market snapshot for October 12, 2026
Robinhood Chain printed $839.8M in tracked 24-hour DEX volume across 223 pools and 167 tokens, with 1,225,971 trades captured at 18:47 UTC on October 12, 2026. The feed showed 20+ new pools in the last 24 hours, with the count capped by the source.
Uniswap V4 (Robinhood) led tracked flow at $460.4M across 119 pools. Uniswap V3 (Robinhood) followed at $325.9M across 63 pools, while Ramses V3 added $21.1M, Pons V2 Dex $9.4M, and Up V3 $7.4M. Here, “tracked” means the sum of GeckoTerminal’s most active pools rather than every pool on the chain.
What moved the market
New listings dominated the leaderboard. Nine of the top 10 gainers had pools 17 hours old or less, and every triple- or quadruple-digit move in that group should be read first as a listing effect, not proof of a durable trend. The top line looked explosive, but the common pattern was high turnover landing in very young pools with modest liquidity.
A second theme was AI- and agent-branded tokens. Research found current project pages for IMD6900 and NockAI, but not clear dated catalyst posts in the last 7 days. That matters because when official news is thin, the cleaner explanation is order flow: traders rotated into names with recognizable themes, and the pool age did the rest.
The broader chain backdrop was more mixed. CoinDesk reported on October 10 that Robinhood Chain activity had slowed from mid-September, with daily transactions down 42% and daily active addresses down 31% over its cited window. One reading is that October 12’s hot tape was concentrated in launch trading rather than a chain-wide reacceleration.
Tokenized stocks still mattered even though they did not top the percentage-gainer list. In the tracked high-volume set, SPY turned $15.6M and NVDA $15.1M, which suggests stock-token flow remained material under the meme layer. That fits with Enso’s October 9 post about going live on Robinhood Chain for stock-token use cases, and with The Block’s October 2 report that SEC-related volume caps are already relevant to Robinhood’s stock-token activity.
New pools worth watching
Eight new-token names stood out in the watchlist, and all were 17 hours old or less. PDCAP led that cohort by turnover at $17.4M, but it also fell 84.68% in six hours and 43.67% in one hour, which is a standard warning sign for unstable price discovery rather than a settled market.
The deeper end of the new-pool group was IMD6900 at $437.8k in liquidity, CLAUDIA at $404.0k, and WISP at $368.5k. That is better than the $29.2k seen in SI, but it is still young liquidity and can change fast if early buyers start exiting.
The common pattern was volume running far ahead of depth. CBARA, Paper, WISP, NOCKAI, IMD6900, and SI all posted multi-million-dollar turnover despite pools measured in the low six figures or less. For short-term traders, that means slippage, reversals, and duplicate-symbol confusion matter as much as the headline move.
Biggest losers
The loser board showed how quickly attention rotated out of older names. The worst drop was CLAUDIA at -62.16%, but that was a different contract address from the CLAUDIA token on the winners list, a good reminder that symbol matching alone is not enough.
GIGATENEV fell 39.27% on $1.9M in volume with only $34.5k in liquidity, which is the kind of setup where exits can get crowded. BONER dropped 25.22% despite $2.7M in liquidity, while PONS fell 17.5% on $20.4M in volume and roughly $3.0M in liquidity, making it the most important liquid pullback of the day rather than just a microcap unwind.
How to check a token before trading it
- Check the pool age first. If a pool is less than 48 hours old, giant percentage gains are usually listing effects, not proof of steady demand.
- Compare liquidity with your order size. A trade that is small in dollar terms can still move price sharply when liquidity is only $29k or $49k.
- Look at buyers versus sellers alongside the recent 1-hour and 6-hour change. A token can have many more buyers than sellers and still be fragile if the pool is brand new.
- Verify the contract address on Blockscout against the project’s official page or social account. October 12 had two different CLAUDIA tokens moving in opposite directions.
- Review the quote asset and slippage before signing. WETH and USDG pools are common on Robinhood Chain, but thin pools often need wider slippage and can still fill badly.
- Search for a dated official catalyst. If none exists and the pool is new, assume the listing itself is the main driver until proven otherwise.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best-performing token on Robinhood Chain today?
On October 12, 2026, IMD6900 was the best-performing token in this tracker, up 745,769.42% in 24 hours. Its pool was only 7 hours old, so that move was dominated by listing effects.
Why are some Robinhood Chain tokens up thousands of percent?
On October 12, 2026, most of the biggest gainers were pools less than 18 hours old. In that setting, huge percentage moves usually reflect listing effects and thin early liquidity, not a mature rally.
How do I buy tokens on Robinhood Chain?
Use a wallet that supports EVM networks, fund it with ETH for gas, connect to a Robinhood Chain DEX or aggregator such as RobinSwap, and swap into the token pair you want. Check the contract address, pool age, liquidity, and expected slippage before signing.
Are tokenized stocks still active on Robinhood Chain?
Yes. On October 12, 2026, SPY posted $15.6M in tracked 24-hour volume and NVDA posted $15.1M, even though meme and new-launch tokens led the percentage-gainer list.
Sources
- IMD6900 · the identity.md machine strategy imd6900.pages.dev
- NockAI: open coding models that run on your machine nockai.dev
- CoinDesk reported a sharp slowdown in Robinhood Chain activity coindesk.com
- Enso said it went live on Robinhood Chain blog.enso.build
- The Block quoted Robinhood’s crypto chief on SEC limits for tokenized stocks theblock.co
Trade on Robinhood Chain
Swap any token on Robinhood Chain or bridge in from Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and more. Non-custodial, live quotes.
Not financial advice. Token prices on Robinhood Chain move fast and new pools can lose most of their value within hours. Figures reflect the moment of capture on October 12, 2026. This article was produced automatically by the RobinSwap editorial pipeline from live on-chain data and the public sources listed above. RobinSwap is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc.