Top 10 Robinhood Chain tokens today: October 13, 2026
Robinhood Chain on October 13, 2026 was driven by brand-new meme pools, with tracked 24-hour volume reaching $1.12B across 224 monitored pools.

Top 10 movers on Robinhood Chain
| # | Token | Price | 24h | 7d | 24h volume | Liquidity | Trades | Pool age | DEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $0.01337 | +4,959% | — | $11.24M | $367,641 | 25,062 | 23h | Uniswap V3 | |
| 2 | salutefaceSalute face | $0.000363 | +3,868% | — | $3M | $65,101 | 30,417 | 27h | Bankr |
| 3 | $0.00862 | +3,754% | — | $25.7M | $148,408 | 33,201 | 22h | Uniswap V4 | |
| 4 | SCISuper Crypto Inu | $0.000914 | +3,153% | — | $2.92M | $122,988 | 4,420 | 2h | Uniswap V4 |
| 5 | salutefaceSalute face | $0.00000439 | +3,019% | — | $4.48M | $71,081 | 8,471 | 3h | Uniswap V4 |
| 6 | FHSCATFundhouse Cat | $0.0000089 | +2,492% | — | $2.66M | $143,572 | 2,365 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 7 | VERDEXVerdex | $0.0000971 | +2,471% | — | $3.55M | $28,939 | 5,561 | 2h | Uniswap V3 |
| 8 | GMOTHGlitchMoth | $0.00000469 | +1,702% | — | $1.29M | $95,776 | 1,614 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 9 | S&P500Socks & Pussy 500 | $0.000256 | +1,329% | — | $1.07M | $54,327 | 3,273 | 2h | Uniswap V4 |
| 10 | trenchcattrenchcat | $0.000142 | +1,303% | — | $1.21M | $65,365 | 5,840 | 2h | Uniswap V3 |
Data from GeckoTerminal, captured at 16:48 UTC on October 13, 2026. Volume and trades are summed across each token's tracked pools; price, liquidity and pool age come from its deepest pool. Only tokens with at least $10k liquidity and 100 trades in 24 hours qualify.
Token by token: what happened and possible catalysts
1
casino no crying in the casino+4,959%
$0.01337 · vol $11.24M · liq $367,641 · 25,062 trades (3,135 buyers / 2,833 sellers) · mcap $13.09M
casino rose 4,958.61% in 24 hours on $11.2M volume, with 3,135 buyers and 2,833 sellers against $367.6k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the pool is only 23 hours old, so the move looks mainly like a launch/listing effect amplified by active two-way trading in a WETH pair. Risk: the pool is under 48 hours old, so volatility and reversals can be extreme.
2saluteface Salute face+3,868%
$0.000363 · vol $3M · liq $65,101 · 30,417 trades (1,780 buyers / 1,761 sellers) · mcap $348,735
This WETH-quoted saluteface pool rose 3,019.29% in 24 hours on $4.5M volume, with 606 buyers and 571 sellers against $71.1k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 3-hour age and balanced flow point to a fresh listing effect, not a confirmed project event. Risk: the pool is under 48 hours old, so sharp retracements are common.
3
Hound Dividend Hound+3,754%
$0.00862 · vol $25.7M · liq $148,408 · 33,201 trades (3,103 buyers / 2,914 sellers) · mcap $8.57M
Hound climbed 3,753.98% in 24 hours on $25.7M volume, with 3,103 buyers and 2,914 sellers against $148.4k liquidity. Possible catalysts: weak evidence from third-party X mirrors pointed to fresh 'dividend hounds' chatter, which may have helped attention, but the 22-hour pool age still makes this look largely like launch-driven trading. Risk: the pool is under 48 hours old and had a 52.22% drop over the last 6 hours.
4SCI Super Crypto Inu+3,153%
$0.000914 · vol $2.92M · liq $122,988 · 4,420 trades (1,338 buyers / 734 sellers) · mcap $691,818
SCI jumped 3,152.7% in 24 hours on $2.9M volume, with 1,338 buyers and 734 sellers against $123.0k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 2-hour pool age and clear buyer lead suggest an early listing spike rather than an established trend. Risk: the pool is only 2 hours old, so the price move is almost entirely launch-phase behavior.
5saluteface Salute face+3,019%
$0.00000439 · vol $4.48M · liq $71,081 · 8,471 trades (606 buyers / 571 sellers) · mcap $472,135
This WETH-quoted saluteface pool rose 3,019.29% in 24 hours on $4.5M volume, with 606 buyers and 571 sellers against $71.1k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 3-hour age and balanced flow point to a fresh listing effect, not a confirmed project event. Risk: the pool is under 48 hours old, so sharp retracements are common.
6FHSCAT Fundhouse Cat+2,492%
$0.0000089 · vol $2.66M · liq $143,572 · 2,365 trades (1,071 buyers / 674 sellers) · mcap $940,933
FHSCAT advanced 2,491.76% in 24 hours on $2.7M volume, with 1,071 buyers and 674 sellers against $143.6k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; buyer-heavy flow in a 1-hour WETH pool suggests the move came from initial launch rotation. Risk: the pool is only 1 hour old, so quoted gains are not a sign of price stability.
7VERDEX Verdex+2,471%
$0.0000971 · vol $3.55M · liq $28,939 · 5,561 trades (2,548 buyers / 106 sellers) · mcap $97,140
VERDEX gained 2,471% in 24 hours on $3.6M volume, with 2,548 buyers and 106 sellers against only $28.9k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the buyer imbalance and 2-hour age fit a launch spike, while the -97.7% move in the last hour shows how quickly that spike can unwind. Risk: liquidity is only $28.9k and the pool is 2 hours old.
8GMOTH GlitchMoth+1,702%
$0.00000469 · vol $1.29M · liq $95,776 · 1,614 trades (802 buyers / 452 sellers) · mcap $663,914
GMOTH rose 1,702.09% in 24 hours on $1.3M volume, with 802 buyers and 452 sellers against $95.8k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 1-hour pool age and buyer-heavy flow point to first-hour listing demand rather than a documented catalyst. Risk: the pool is only 1 hour old, so fills and price swings can change quickly.
9S&P500 Socks & Pussy 500+1,329%
$0.000256 · vol $1.07M · liq $54,327 · 3,273 trades (1,130 buyers / 889 sellers) · mcap $255,107
S&P500 climbed 1,328.96% in 24 hours on $1.1M volume, with 1,130 buyers and 889 sellers against $54.3k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the only obvious reference in metadata was a Polymarket X link, which is not a clear Robinhood Chain catalyst, so this still reads as a 2-hour listing effect. Risk: the pool is under 48 hours old and liquidity is still thin for the turnover it handled.
10trenchcat trenchcat+1,303%
$0.000142 · vol $1.21M · liq $65,365 · 5,840 trades (1,301 buyers / 1,065 sellers) · mcap $145,291
trenchcat gained 1,303.26% in 24 hours on $1.2M volume, with 1,301 buyers and 1,065 sellers against $65.4k liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 2-hour WETH pool and steady two-way flow suggest ordinary early launch rotation more than any confirmed news event. Risk: the pool is under 48 hours old, so percentage moves can reverse fast.
Robinhood Chain market snapshot for October 13, 2026
At 16:48 UTC on October 13, 2026, tracked Robinhood Chain volume was $1.12B across 224 pools and 164 tokens, with 1,583,810 trades captured in the monitored set. The feed also showed 20+ new pools in the last 24 hours, though that counter is capped.
Uniswap V4 (Robinhood) led the day with $579.3M across 135 pools. Uniswap V3 (Robinhood) followed at $470.5M across 50 pools, then Ramses V3 at $23.3M, Pons V2 Dex at $8.1M, Up V3 at $7.5M, and Sushiswap V3 (Robinhood) at $6.9M.
Here, "tracked" means the sum of the monitored GeckoTerminal pools in the dataset, not the whole chain.
What moved the market
The main story was launch-day pricing. Every token in the top-10 movers list came from a pool only 1 to 27 hours old, and none had a 7-day change yet. On pools that young, four-digit gains are usually listing effects created by the first burst of routing, discovery, and thin early liquidity, not mature trend moves.

That reading also fits the other side of the board. The biggest losers list was full of fresh pools too, with several names down more than 96% in less than two days. When both winners and losers are concentrated in brand-new pools, the market is behaving more like a rotating launch tape than a settled sector move.
A second theme was the mix of quote assets. Most of the top movers were paired against WETH, but one of the two saluteface pools was quoted against NVDA on Bankr. That suggests Robinhood Chain traders are comfortable moving between standard crypto pairs and stock-token quote assets, even though the biggest percentage swings on October 13, 2026 still came from meme-style launches rather than tokenized stock tokens.
Broader chain conditions matter in the background. CoinDesk reported on October 10 that Robinhood Chain averaged 6.2 million daily transactions from October 2 through October 8, down 42% from mid-September, while daily active addresses were down 31%. Even with that slowdown, the monitored DEX set still printed $1.12B in 24-hour volume on October 13, 2026, which suggests speculative trading can stay intense in a narrow set of active pools even when chain-wide participation cools.
There is also a structural tokenization angle. The Block reported on October 2 that the SEC's innovation exemption still leaves limits on volume and which assets can be tokenized, which may shape how Robinhood Chain's stock-token market develops. That matters for quote-asset design and long-run market depth, but on this date it was secondary to short-lived meme-pool turnover.
One mover had at least some social chatter attached to it. For Hound, the only recent evidence we found was weak, third-party mirrored X activity around "dividend hounds" on TwStalker. That may have helped attention, but it is much softer evidence than an official launch post or project announcement.
New pools worth watching
If the goal is to watch behavior rather than chase it, the busiest fresh pools were Hound, IMD6900, Paper, WISP, and casino. Those names combined large dollar volume with pools younger than 30 hours, which makes them useful readouts on where speculative flow is rotating.
The cleaner setups, purely on liquidity, were Paper with $1.15M liquidity and WISP with $497.4k. They are still very new, but deeper liquidity usually means lower slippage than the thinner launch pools.
The unstable setups were the names with heavy turnover but shallow depth. NOCKAI and CAPITOL both handled large volume with less than $16k liquidity, and that kind of mismatch often leads to violent retracements. A similar caution applies to one-hour and two-hour pools, where price discovery is still incomplete.
Biggest losers
The downside list shows the same launch mechanics in reverse. NOCKAI fell 98.46% in 24 hours, astro dropped 98.38%, CLAUDIA lost 96.38%, CAPITOL fell 96.14%, and BIC lost 96%.
Most of those drawdowns happened with limited liquidity and very young pools. CAPITOL had only $13k of liquidity and NOCKAI only $15.9k, while CLAUDIA was still just 39 hours old. The older outlier was astro, whose pool was about 840 hours old but still had only $10.7k liquidity, a reminder that age alone does not make a market safer.
How to check a token before trading it
- Check the contract address, not just the ticker. Duplicate symbols happen, and October 13, 2026 included two different saluteface tokens with different addresses and quote assets.
- Look at liquidity depth before looking at price change. A token can do millions in volume and still have less than $30k or $50k of liquidity, which raises slippage and reversal risk.
- Check pool age. A one-hour or two-hour pool has almost no trading history, and four-digit gains in those pools are usually listing effects.
- Compare buyers and sellers over 24 hours. A gap can hint at momentum, but balanced flow in a brand-new pool can also mean fast two-way speculation rather than conviction.
- Verify the pair on the Robinhood Chain Blockscout explorer before swapping. Make sure the token address and quote asset match the market you intend to trade.
- Use conservative slippage settings and expect higher failure or worse fills in shallow pools. Gas on Robinhood Chain is paid in ETH, so keep some ETH in the wallet for transactions.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best-performing token on Robinhood Chain today?
On October 13, 2026, the best-performing token in the tracked movers list was casino, up 4,958.61% in 24 hours. Its pool was only 23 hours old, so that jump reads as a listing effect rather than a mature trend.
How do I buy tokens on Robinhood Chain?
Use a wallet that supports Robinhood Chain, fund it with assets on the network, and keep some ETH for gas. Then swap through a Robinhood Chain DEX or aggregator such as RobinSwap, but check the token contract, liquidity depth, pool age, and slippage settings before confirming any trade.
Why are some Robinhood Chain tokens up 3,000% in a day?
On October 13, 2026, every top-10 mover came from a pool only 1 to 27 hours old. In brand-new pools, the first wave of trading can create huge percentage changes that are listing effects, not steady organic rallies.
How do I verify a token contract on Robinhood Chain?
Check the token address on the Robinhood Chain Blockscout explorer and match it to the exact pool you plan to trade. That matters because duplicate symbols can exist; on October 13, 2026, there were two different saluteface pools with different addresses and quote assets.
Sources
Trade on Robinhood Chain
Swap any token on Robinhood Chain or bridge in from Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and more. Non-custodial, live quotes.
Not financial advice. Token prices on Robinhood Chain move fast and new pools can lose most of their value within hours. Figures reflect the moment of capture on October 13, 2026. This article was produced automatically by the RobinSwap editorial pipeline from live on-chain data and the public sources listed above. RobinSwap is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc.