Robinhood Chain Today: New Pools and Stock-Token Flow

Robinhood Chain is active on two fronts right now: large notional flow in new Uniswap V4 pools, and fast speculative trading in fresh meme-style launches. In the tracked market snapshot captured on October 8, 2026, SPY, NVDA and SUSD help explain where the serious size is landing, while CREORA, BBDGR and swordcat show where the churn is.

Robinhood Chain volume is highly concentrated on Uniswap V4

The tracked snapshot covers 226 pools and 162 tokens on Robinhood Chain, with about $4.47 billion in 24-hour volume and 1.33 million tracked trades. It also shows 20-plus new pools in the last 24 hours, with the feed capped.

That activity is not evenly spread across venues. It is overwhelmingly concentrated on Uniswap V4.

So the short answer to “where is real trading happening” is: mostly on Uniswap V4, with Uniswap V3 still relevant, and everything else far behind in this snapshot.

This needs one caveat. GeckoTerminal’s broader Robinhood pools page showed a slightly different snapshot, around $4.63 billion in 24-hour volume and 2.61 million transactions, when it was crawled separately. The difference is timing and page scope, not necessarily a contradiction. These are snapshots of tracked pools, not a definitive chainwide total.

Robinhood Chain itself is an Ethereum Layer 2 built on Arbitrum Orbit, with chain ID 4663 and ETH as gas, according to the official Robinhood Chain docs and network page.

The biggest dollar flow is landing in new SUSD-linked pools

If the venue split tells one story, the top pools tell another. The biggest dollar flow is sitting in a fresh cluster of V4 pools that are only about 40 hours old.

SUSD leads the token list with about $224.0 million in 24-hour volume and $13.6 million in liquidity. But that volume is spread across several brand-new pairs rather than one retail-heavy pool.

The largest SUSD-linked pools in the snapshot are:

• SUSD / AI: $72.3M volume, $13.6M liquidity, 356 transactions
• SUSD / ORBIO: $50.6M volume, $13.3M liquidity, 524 transactions
• SUSD / V4: $50.4M volume, $1.4M liquidity, 4,888 transactions
• SUSD / UBIK: $36.0M volume, $2.1M liquidity, 2,280 transactions
• SUSD / HOOKR: $14.8M volume, $4.4M liquidity, 468 transactions

The same pattern shows up in PONS / SUSD, another new V4 pool with about $124.7 million in 24-hour volume, $13.7 million in liquidity, and only 173 transactions.

That combination matters. High volume with relatively low transaction count usually points to large-ticket flow, rebalancing, arbitrage, or concentrated activity among a smaller set of traders. It does not look like broad retail churn in the way a 50,000-trade memecoin pool does.

Tokenized-stock flow on Robinhood Chain is real, but split by pair

The tokenized-stock side is active enough that it deserves its own lens. GeckoTerminal’s Robinhood tokenized securities category showed about $161.8 million in 24-hour volume and 336,690 transactions in a separate snapshot.

That lines up with the wider reporting. CoinDesk Research said Robinhood became the largest venue for on-chain tokenized equity trading in September, with $6.57 billion in volume and a 42.0% venue share. The Block also reported on October 1, 2026 that Robinhood Wallet added Arcus as another routing venue for stock-token swaps and supports more than 190 stock tokens.

Within today’s market data, NVDA is the clearest example of split flow.

One NVDA-labeled Robinhood Token address, paired with SUSD on Uniswap V4 and only about 40 hours old, shows roughly $122.8 million in 24-hour volume with $4.6 million in liquidity and just 502 transactions. That is one of the largest single pools in the entire snapshot.

A second NVDA-labeled address, older and spread across USDG and WETH pools, shows about $13.7 million in token-level 24-hour volume and 27,427 trades. Same label, different address structure, very different flow profile.

SPY looks different again. Its token-level snapshot shows about $19.1 million in 24-hour volume and 42,644 trades, with the deepest named pool being SPY / WETH on Uniswap V3 at about $5.4 million volume and $1.66 million liquidity.

SPY also trades across a wider web of pairings than the fresh NVDA/SUSD pool. The snapshot includes SPY / USDG, SPY / NVDA, SPY / INTC, SPY / MU, SPY / PLTR, SPY / AMD, SPY / HIMS, and SPY / TSM. One reading is that SPY is acting less like a single-pool market and more like a routing hub for stock-to-stock or stock-to-quote activity.

That is useful context because it shows Robinhood Chain’s stock-token trading is not just one stable pair with one venue. Some names are concentrated. Others are distributed.

New meme-style pools are dominating attention and trade count

The other major pocket of activity is fresh speculative launches.

CREORA is the most important example in the current snapshot. Its pool is only about 15 hours old, but it has already done roughly $14.9 million in 24-hour volume across 51,319 trades with about $366,800 in liquidity. Buyers and sellers are close, at 6,112 versus 5,645, which suggests active two-way trading rather than one-sided early buys.

BBDGR is newer, at about 7 hours old. It shows about $11.4 million in volume, 14,008 trades, $255,100 in liquidity, and more buyers than sellers, 3,903 versus 2,774.

swordcat is younger still, only about 2 hours old, with roughly $3.16 million in volume, 4,154 trades, and $296,000 in liquidity.

These numbers matter more than the raw percentage gains. swordcat is up more than 53,000% in 24 hours, and BBDGR more than 11,000%, but on pools that are only hours old those are listing effects, not organic long-run rallies. The same caution applies to other fresh movers such as SWARM and ORBANCY.

Research did not find a confirmed news catalyst for most of these names. For BBDGR and ORBANCY, the most plausible explanation is simply a recent launch or activation. For CREORA, swordcat and several others, there was no verified catalyst in the research set, so the safest reading comes from on-chain signals: high turnover, shallow relative liquidity, very young pool age, and heavy launch-day attention.

Robinhood Chain right now looks like two markets on one network

Put the pieces together and Robinhood Chain looks bifurcated on October 8, 2026.

The first market is large notional flow. It sits mostly in Uniswap V4, especially in new SUSD-linked pools and large tokenized-stock pools such as NVDA/SUSD. These pools can clear tens or hundreds of millions of dollars with surprisingly low transaction counts.

The second market is high-churn launch trading. It shows up in names like CREORA, BBDGR and swordcat, where trade counts are high, liquidity is much thinner, and price moves are extreme because the pools are very young.

Smaller venues are still relevant in pockets. SPY, for example, has meaningful flow on Uniswap V3, Uniswap V4, Ramses, and Alandale. But at the network level, the data says concentration is the rule, not the exception.

Risks and things to double-check

• Tracked volume is not all on-chain volume. The DATA snapshot is built from GeckoTerminal’s tracked pools, and different GeckoTerminal pages showed slightly different totals at different crawl times.
• Symbols can repeat across addresses. NVDA, PONS, AI and V4 appear in multiple entries with different addresses or pair structures, so pool-level checks matter.
• Brand-new pools carry high risk. A token that is 2 to 15 hours old can show huge percentage moves that are mostly listing effects.
• Low liquidity changes the picture fast. Fresh meme-style pools with a few hundred thousand dollars of liquidity can move sharply on relatively small orders.
• Recent security warnings matter. The Block reported on September 27, 2026 that an analyst linked $18.4 million in Robinhood Chain memecoin extractions to a single rug-pull operation. That does not invalidate all new launches, but it does raise the bar for caution.