Top 10 Robinhood Chain tokens today: November 9, 2026
Robinhood Chain on November 9, 2026 was a new-pool market: tracked 24-hour volume hit $704.2M while most top movers were just 20 hours old or less.
Top 10 movers on Robinhood Chain
| # | Token | Price | 24h | 7d | 24h volume | Liquidity | Trades | Pool age | DEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | BEEPZBEEPZ | $0.00000121 | +2,701% | — | $1.18M | $32,571 | 5,260 | 4h | Uniswap V4 |
| 2 | TREMPDenald Tremp | $0.000148 | +1,642% | — | $358,528 | $62,660 | 2,436 | 1h | Uniswap V3 |
| 3 | CupseyThe Cupsey Files | $0.00000394 | +1,535% | — | $965,427 | $169,242 | 1,694 | 1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 4 | QUINNQuinn the Corgi | $0.000236 | +1,415% | — | $2.92M | $104,244 | 8,143 | 18h | Uniswap V4 |
| 5 | MAXMax | $0.00000119 | +834% | — | $1.77M | $59,179 | 6,448 | 4h | Uniswap V4 |
| 6 | TREMPDenald Tremp | $0.000179 | +741% | — | $321,360 | $101,983 | 553 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 7 | EIElon Inu | $0.000157 | +622% | — | $273,206 | $92,878 | 612 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 8 | NOVASINova Intelligence | $0.0000907 | +609% | — | $1.29M | $55,195 | 2,258 | 3h | Uniswap V4 |
| 9 | S&P500Spongebob & Patrick 500 | $0.000000771 | +504% | — | $465,074 | $46,589 | 1,952 | 20h | Uniswap V4 |
| 10 | GPUNVIDIA GPU | $0.0000957 | +352% | — | $1.1M | $68,570 | 3,474 | 10h | Uniswap V4 |
Data from GeckoTerminal, captured at 19:38 UTC on November 9, 2026. Volume and trades are summed across each token's tracked pools; price, liquidity and pool age come from its deepest pool. Only tokens with at least $10k liquidity and 100 trades in 24 hours qualify.
What changed since the previous report?
0 of this report's 10 tokens also appeared in the report for Nov 8, 2026. The other 10 are new to this selection, not necessarily newly created tokens.
Changes compare the two report snapshots. Volume is a rolling 24-hour measure at each capture. Higher volume indicates more recorded trading; liquidity describes pool depth. Neither proves a price catalyst. Missing comparisons are not estimated.
Token by token: what happened and possible catalysts
1BEEPZ BEEPZ+2,701%
$0.00000121 · vol $1.18M · liq $32,571 · 5,260 trades (1,160 buyers / 893 sellers) · mcap $126,692
BEEPZ jumped 2701.16% in 24 hours on $1.18M of volume, with 1,160 buyers against 893 sellers and $32.6k in liquidity. The scale of the move is a listing effect in a 4-hour-old pool, not an established rally. Possible catalysts: research links BEEPZ to the beepz inscription platform and a fresh community-token launch; risk is high because the pool is only 4 hours old and liquidity is under $50k.
2TREMP Denald Tremp+1,642%
$0.000148 · vol $358,528 · liq $62,660 · 2,436 trades (950 buyers / 743 sellers) · mcap $198,718
A second TREMP contract also made the movers list, up 741.03% in 24 hours on $321.4k of volume, with 236 buyers against 148 sellers and $102.0k in liquidity. With only 1 hour of pool history, this also looks like a listing effect, and the duplicate symbol points to copycat flow rather than settled price discovery. Possible catalysts: the same Trump-themed headline cycle may have spilled into multiple contracts; risk is high because the pool is only 1 hour old.
3Cupsey The Cupsey Files+1,535%
$0.00000394 · vol $965,427 · liq $169,242 · 1,694 trades (885 buyers / 428 sellers) · mcap $210,463
Cupsey gained 1535.12% in 24 hours on $965.4k of volume, with 885 buyers against 428 sellers and $169.2k in liquidity. In a 1-hour-old pool, that kind of move is a listing effect, and the buyer skew shows early speculative demand. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the best read is launch-day momentum driven by one-sided order flow and 1,694 trades; risk is high because the pool is only 1 hour old.
4QUINN Quinn the Corgi+1,415%
$0.000236 · vol $2.92M · liq $104,244 · 8,143 trades (1,304 buyers / 1,359 sellers) · mcap $242,094
QUINN climbed 1414.6% in 24 hours on $2.92M of volume, with 1,304 buyers and 1,359 sellers and $104.2k in liquidity. Despite the big gain, sellers slightly outnumbered buyers, which suggests heavy churn inside an 18-hour-old pool rather than a clean breakout. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the move likely came from fast meme rotation and 8,143 trades in a brand-new market; risk is high because the pool is only 18 hours old.
5MAX Max+834%
$0.00000119 · vol $1.77M · liq $59,179 · 6,448 trades (1,235 buyers / 951 sellers) · mcap $94,022
MAX rose 833.93% in 24 hours on $1.77M of volume, with 1,235 buyers versus 951 sellers and $59.2k in liquidity. The buyer lead and 6,448 trades point to strong launch-day attention, but the 4-hour pool age means the gain is still a listing effect. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the move appears driven by fresh-pool speculation and high turnover; risk is high because the pool is only 4 hours old.
6TREMP Denald Tremp+741%
$0.000179 · vol $321,360 · liq $101,983 · 553 trades (236 buyers / 148 sellers) · mcap $118,293
A second TREMP contract also made the movers list, up 741.03% in 24 hours on $321.4k of volume, with 236 buyers against 148 sellers and $102.0k in liquidity. With only 1 hour of pool history, this also looks like a listing effect, and the duplicate symbol points to copycat flow rather than settled price discovery. Possible catalysts: the same Trump-themed headline cycle may have spilled into multiple contracts; risk is high because the pool is only 1 hour old.
7EI Elon Inu+622%
$0.000157 · vol $273,206 · liq $92,878 · 612 trades (277 buyers / 151 sellers) · mcap $168,537
EI gained 622.05% in 24 hours on $273.2k of volume, with 277 buyers versus 151 sellers and $92.9k in liquidity. That buyer-seller imbalance is notable, but the pool is only 1 hour old, so the move still fits a launch spike. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the move most likely came from early meme demand in a fresh pool; risk is high because the pool is only 1 hour old.
8NOVASI Nova Intelligence+609%
$0.0000907 · vol $1.29M · liq $55,195 · 2,258 trades (964 buyers / 564 sellers) · mcap $61,064
NOVASI rose 609.44% in 24 hours on $1.29M of volume, with 964 buyers against 564 sellers and $55.2k in liquidity. The token was still down 85.79% in the last hour, which shows how unstable a 3-hour-old market can be even with strong headline gains. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the best explanation is launch-day AI-branded speculation and a temporary buyer lead; risk is high because the pool is only 3 hours old.
9S&P500 Spongebob & Patrick 500+504%
$0.000000771 · vol $465,074 · liq $46,589 · 1,952 trades (636 buyers / 398 sellers) · mcap $76,680
S&P500 advanced 504.08% in 24 hours on $465.1k of volume, with 636 buyers versus 398 sellers and $46.6k in liquidity. The pool is 20 hours old, so the outsized gain is still a listing effect rather than a mature trend. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, so the move likely came from meme branding plus early buy pressure; risk is high because the pool is only 20 hours old and liquidity is under $50k.
10GPU NVIDIA GPU+352%
$0.0000957 · vol $1.1M · liq $68,570 · 3,474 trades (1,002 buyers / 836 sellers) · mcap $95,719
GPU gained 351.82% in 24 hours on $1.10M of volume, with 1,002 buyers against 836 sellers and $68.6k in liquidity. The pool is just 10 hours old, so the move still sits in the launch window even though turnover was heavy at 3,474 trades. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found, and the clearest on-chain read is hardware-themed meme interest with steady buyer flow; risk is high because the pool is only 10 hours old.
Robinhood Chain market snapshot for November 9, 2026
Robinhood Chain tracked $704.2 million in 24-hour DEX volume across 227 pools and 131 tokens as of 2026-11-09 19:38 UTC. Those pools produced 1,281,574 trades, and the feed showed 20+ new pools in the last 24 hours, with the count capped by the source feed.
Uniswap V3 (Robinhood) led the tracked venues with $317.8 million across 53 pools. Uniswap V4 (Robinhood) followed with $228.2 million across 117 pools, then Aero Slipstream (Robinhood) at $76.6 million, Metric (Robinhood) at $46.9 million, and Ramses V3 (Robinhood) at $18.0 million.
Here, “tracked” means the sum over the most active GeckoTerminal pools, not the entire chain. That matters because Robinhood Chain has a wider DEX footprint than the daily feed can fully represent.
What moved the market
The main story was simple: new listings dominated the leader board. All 10 top movers were new pools between 1 hour and 20 hours old, and every one of them posted a triple-digit daily gain. When a pool is less than two days old, gains of 500% to 2,700% are listing effects first and organic rallies second.
The clearest project-specific context belonged to BEEPZ. Research tied it to the beepz inscription platform on Robinhood Chain, which at least gives the token a visible launch narrative beyond a random ticker. Even there, the on-chain picture still looked like a launch spike: $1.18 million in volume against only about $32.6k in liquidity.
TREMP looked more like pure headline trading. The only credible off-chain catalyst in research was a Forbes report about a satirical Trump statue published on November 9, 2026, and two separate TREMP contracts appeared in the movers list. That kind of duplicate-symbol behavior usually points to copycats and fast speculation, not a stable market structure.
For most of the rest of the list, there was no credible news trail at all. Cupsey, QUINN, MAX, EI, NOVASI, S&P500, and GPU all read more like attention trades than news trades, with volume, buyers-versus-sellers, and pool age doing most of the explanatory work. QUINN and MAX were especially active, but both were still inside the first-day listing window.
One useful contrast is that the mover board was meme-heavy while chain volume was still anchored by deeper markets, especially tokenized stocks and a few older pools. That split fits the broader pattern CoinDesk described: Robinhood Chain can host large tokenized-stock turnover and still see most day-to-day excitement cluster around small speculative launches.
New pools worth watching
The busiest fresh listing was Claude, which was only 16 hours old but already had $22.1 million in 24-hour volume and $2.15 million in liquidity. That is very different from most of the top movers: more depth, more turnover, and a much smaller 24-hour gain at 33.16%, even after a sharp 80.4% six-hour drop.
Among the meme-style new pools, QUINN, MAX, NOVASI, BEEPZ, GPU, and Cupsey all cleared roughly $1.0 million or more in volume or came close to it. That tells us traders were rotating quickly across multiple fresh tickers instead of concentrating in one dominant launch.
XCoin is another pool worth watching mainly because the volume-to-liquidity balance looks fragile. It did $1.38 million in 24-hour volume with only $21.6k in liquidity and was just 14 hours old, which is the kind of setup where small trades can move price hard in both directions.
The practical question for every new pool is not just whether volume is high, but whether liquidity is catching up. If liquidity stays thin while volume stays hot, the market can remain extremely jumpy.
Biggest losers
The loser board looked older and more mixed than the winner board. OAK fell 34.62%, FOBO dropped 27.29%, GIGATENEV lost 19.84%, HMM slipped 18.48%, and UNIWALL fell 17.71%.
FOBO stands out because it still had about $4.48 million in liquidity, far deeper than the other losers, which suggests a retracement in a more established pool rather than a simple liquidity vacuum. UNIWALL was the opposite case: only about $12.7k in liquidity but 16,446 trades, a combination that can amplify volatility and make price moves look larger than the capital behind them.
How to check a token before trading it
- Check pool age first. A token that is 1 to 20 hours old can show huge percentage gains that mostly reflect initial price discovery.
- Compare liquidity with volume. A pool doing $1 million in volume with $20k to $50k in liquidity can move violently and may not absorb exits well.
- Look at buyers versus sellers and total trades. Heavy buyer leads can support a launch for a while, but balanced or sell-heavy counts can signal churn instead of accumulation.
- Verify the contract address on the explorer. Robinhood Chain uses Blockscout, and duplicate symbols can exist at the same time, as the two TREMP contracts on November 9, 2026 showed.
- Check the quote asset and slippage before submitting a swap. Most pools use WETH or USDG, and thin pools often need wider slippage settings, which can worsen execution.
- Start small on brand-new pools. A small test trade can reveal whether the market is behaving normally before size gets involved.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best-performing token on Robinhood Chain today?
On November 9, 2026, BEEPZ was the best-performing token in this mover list on Robinhood Chain, up 2,701.16% in 24 hours. Its pool was only 4 hours old, so that move should be read as a listing effect.
Why are some Robinhood Chain tokens up more than 1,000% today?
Most of the biggest gainers on November 9, 2026 were brand-new pools between 1 hour and 20 hours old. In pools younger than two days, very large percentage jumps are usually listing effects caused by thin early liquidity and fast speculative trading.
How do I buy tokens on Robinhood Chain?
Use a self-custody wallet that supports the network, fund it with ETH for gas, and connect to a DEX or aggregator on Robinhood Chain. Before swapping, check the token’s contract address, pool age, liquidity depth, and slippage settings.
Are Robinhood Chain tokenized stocks the same as meme tokens?
No. Tokens whose names end with “• Robinhood Token” are Robinhood’s tokenized stock tokens that trade in DEX pools, while meme tokens are separate crypto assets with their own pools and much different risk profiles.
Sources
Token prices, history and contracts · Network statistics · Bridge from Ethereum · Bridge from Base
Trade on Robinhood Chain
Swap any token on Robinhood Chain or bridge in from Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and more. Non-custodial, live quotes.
Not financial advice. Token prices on Robinhood Chain move fast and new pools can lose most of their value within hours. Figures reflect the moment of capture on November 9, 2026. This article was produced automatically by the RobinSwap editorial pipeline from live on-chain data and the public sources listed above. RobinSwap is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc.