Top 10 Robinhood Chain tokens today: November 8, 2026
Robinhood Chain on November 8, 2026 was driven by fresh listings, with tracked 24-hour volume reaching $263.8M across 221 active pools.
Top 10 movers on Robinhood Chain
| # | Token | Price | 24h | 7d | 24h volume | Liquidity | Trades | Pool age | DEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLAUDIAClaudia Coin | $0.00142 | +42,456% | — | $1.91M | $110,754 | 8,011 | 14h | Uniswap V4 |
| 2 | putercatonputer | $0.000206 | +8,259% | — | $334,322 | $40,862 | 1,190 | 22h | Uniswap V4 |
| 3 | MEMEmemecoin | $0.000319 | +1,683% | — | $484,489 | $126,728 | 901 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 4 | CHIMERAChimera Vocal Synth | $0.0000971 | +1,345% | — | $519,725 | $44,257 | 3,118 | 2h | Uniswap V3 |
| 5 | MAGGIEGargantuan Cat | $0.000322 | +1,340% | — | $456,832 | $141,746 | 823 | 14h | Uniswap V4 |
| 6 | TelepawthyTelepawthy | $0.0000775 | +1,327% | — | $1.18M | $33,191 | 5,809 | 4h | Uniswap V3 |
| 7 | JASONJason Duval | $0.00000306 | +1,045% | — | $471,036 | $132,466 | 812 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 8 | MGLmegalith | $0.000246 | +1000% | — | $414,082 | $131,601 | 817 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
| 9 |  GCGlobalCoin | $0.000508 | +859% | +835% | $2.4M | $46,080 | 11,908 | 2w | Uniswap V4 |
| 10 | MOTUMotu | $0.000186 | +503% | — | $51,589 | $31,901 | 196 | <1h | Uniswap V4 |
Data from GeckoTerminal, captured at 15:52 UTC on November 8, 2026. Volume and trades are summed across each token's tracked pools; price, liquidity and pool age come from its deepest pool. Only tokens with at least $10k liquidity and 100 trades in 24 hours qualify.
What changed since the previous report?
0 of this report's 10 tokens also appeared in the report for Nov 7, 2026. The other 10 are new to this selection, not necessarily newly created tokens.
Changes compare the two report snapshots. Volume is a rolling 24-hour measure at each capture. Higher volume indicates more recorded trading; liquidity describes pool depth. Neither proves a price catalyst. Missing comparisons are not estimated.
Token by token: what happened and possible catalysts
1CLAUDIA Claudia Coin+42,456%
$0.00142 · vol $1.91M · liq $110,754 · 8,011 trades (2,520 buyers / 1,633 sellers) · mcap $1.54M
CLAUDIA rose 42,456.48% in 24 hours on $1.9M volume, with 2,520 buyers versus 1,633 sellers and about $110.8k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the clearest read is launch-day price discovery in a 14-hour-old WETH pool with strong net buying. Risk note: this is a brand-new pool, so the move is mostly a listing effect and volatility risk is high.
2puter catonputer+8,259%
$0.000206 · vol $334,322 · liq $40,862 · 1,190 trades (517 buyers / 312 sellers) · mcap $178,416
puter gained 8,259% in 24 hours on $334.3k volume, with 517 buyers versus 312 sellers and $40.9k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: third-party pages reference a PunchingCat X post, but no credible launch explanation was verified; on-chain, the 22-hour-old pool and buyer lead fit a new-listing burst. Risk note: liquidity is only $40.9k and the pool is under 48 hours old.
3MEME memecoin+1,683%
$0.000319 · vol $484,489 · liq $126,728 · 901 trades (439 buyers / 254 sellers) · mcap $422,708
MEME rose 1,683.28% in 24 hours on $484.5k volume, with 439 buyers versus 254 sellers and $126.7k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; with a 1-hour-old pool, this looks like pure listing discovery rather than an organic rally. Risk note: this is a 1-hour-old pool, so the move should be treated as a listing effect.
4CHIMERA Chimera Vocal Synth+1,345%
$0.0000971 · vol $519,725 · liq $44,257 · 3,118 trades (1,203 buyers / 868 sellers) · mcap $95,396
CHIMERA climbed 1,344.66% in 24 hours on $519.7k volume, with 1,203 buyers versus 868 sellers and $44.3k in liquidity, but it fell 50.21% in the last hour. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; one reading is an early spike followed by fast profit-taking, which matches the sharp last-hour reversal. Risk note: liquidity is only $44.3k and the pool is 2 hours old.
5MAGGIE Gargantuan Cat+1,340%
$0.000322 · vol $456,832 · liq $141,746 · 823 trades (327 buyers / 211 sellers) · mcap $322,354
MAGGIE gained 1,340.32% in 24 hours on $456.8k volume, with 327 buyers versus 211 sellers and $141.7k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the buyer skew and 14-hour pool age point to launch-day meme flow rather than a confirmed project event. Risk note: this is a new pool, so the move should be treated as a listing effect.
6Telepawthy Telepawthy+1,327%
$0.0000775 · vol $1.18M · liq $33,191 · 5,809 trades (1,443 buyers / 1,241 sellers) · mcap $82,822
Telepawthy rose 1,326.95% in 24 hours on $1.2M volume, with 1,443 buyers versus 1,241 sellers and $33.2k in liquidity, then dropped 65.63% in the last hour. Possible catalysts: third-party checkers reference an X post, but no credible official announcement was verified; on-chain, heavy turnover and the sharp last-hour drop suggest a fast launch cycle. Risk note: liquidity is only $33.2k and the pool is 4 hours old.
7JASON Jason Duval+1,045%
$0.00000306 · vol $471,036 · liq $132,466 · 812 trades (460 buyers / 197 sellers) · mcap $260,658
JASON gained 1,044.78% in 24 hours on $471k volume, with 460 buyers versus 197 sellers and $132.5k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 1-hour-old pool and strong buyer lead fit a listing effect more than a sustained trend. Risk note: this is a 1-hour-old pool, so slippage and reversal risk are elevated.
8MGL megalith+1000%
$0.000246 · vol $414,082 · liq $131,601 · 817 trades (427 buyers / 212 sellers) · mcap $254,819
MGL rose 999.79% in 24 hours on $414.1k volume, with 427 buyers versus 212 sellers and $131.6k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; this appears to be immediate launch discovery in a just-opened pool with buyers running at roughly 2-to-1 over sellers. Risk note: the pool is only minutes old, so the move is a listing effect until proven otherwise.
9GC GlobalCoin+859%
$0.000508 · vol $2.4M · liq $46,080 · 11,908 trades (611 buyers / 841 sellers) · mcap $508,589
GC gained 859.47% in 24 hours and 835.42% over 7 days on $2.4M volume, with 611 buyers versus 841 sellers and $46.1k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: no credible recent news was found; one reading is that cross-asset routing against META and thin liquidity amplified turnover and swings in an older pool. Risk note: liquidity is only $46.1k, which can magnify slippage even in a pool that is 356 hours old.
10MOTU Motu+503%
$0.000186 · vol $51,589 · liq $31,901 · 196 trades (60 buyers / 42 sellers) · mcap $49,522
MOTU rose 503.36% in 24 hours on $51.6k volume, with 60 buyers versus 42 sellers and $31.9k in liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the pool is only minutes old, so this looks like initial listing discovery on very small size. Risk note: liquidity is only $31.9k and the pool is brand new.
Robinhood Chain market snapshot for November 8, 2026
Robinhood Chain activity stayed heavy on November 8, 2026. The tracked set covered 221 pools and 158 tokens, with $263.8 million in 24-hour volume and 505,893 trades as of 15:52 UTC.
Uniswap V4 (Robinhood) led by a wide margin with $163.1 million across 142 pools. Uniswap V3 (Robinhood) added $41.6 million across 36 pools, while Aero Slipstream (Robinhood) handled $31.1 million across 8 pools and Ramses V3 (Robinhood) handled $14 million across 6 pools.
Metric added another $6.3 million across 13 pools. The feed also showed 20+ new pools in the last 24 hours, with the note that the feed is capped.
Tracked means the volume and trade counts summed across GeckoTerminal's most active pools in the dataset, not the entire chain.
What moved the market
The main story was fresh listings, not mature trends. Nine of the 10 biggest gainers were in pools younger than 24 hours, and several had four-digit percentage moves with less than $150,000 in liquidity. On Robinhood Chain, that is usually a sign of launch-day price discovery, and when the pool is less than two days old those extreme percentage gains are better read as listing effects than organic rallies.
The outside news flow was thin. The broad backdrop still matches the split described by CoinGecko's Robinhood Chain explainer and its Robinhood Chain meme category page: tokenized finance on one side, rapid meme launches on the other. But for most of the day's movers, I could not verify a project post, exchange note, or credible catalyst tied to the price action.
That leaves order flow as the cleaner explanation. Most winners had more buyers than sellers, but the last-hour readings on some names showed how quickly that can reverse. A token can lead the daily board and still be down sharply in the last hour if early traders rush to exit.
GC was the clearest exception because its pool was older, at 356 hours, and it also showed a 7-day gain. Even there, the evidence outside the tape was weak. The only usable references I found were third-party checker pages such as GlobalCoin ($GC) rug check on Robinhood Chain · Modus, which is not enough to confirm a real catalyst.
The same problem showed up in Telepawthy. The token had strong volume, but the only recent references I found were third-party checker pages like $Telepawthy rug check on Robinhood Chain · Klaye, not a verified project announcement. In other words, the market moved faster than the documentation.
One more theme stood out: tokenized stock tokens were active by raw volume but not by percentage change. SPY traded $6.2 million, NVDA traded $2.8 million, META traded $2.6 million, and SPCX traded $2.1 million, yet all four moved less than 1.2% over 24 hours. That is a very different profile from the meme side of the chain, and it fits Robinhood's own positioning of the network as built for onchain finance.
New pools worth watching
The most important new pool was Papertrade. It was only 4 hours old but already showed $21.1 million in 24-hour volume, $4.8 million in liquidity, and 3,280 trades. That is unusually deep for a fresh listing in this dataset, and the buyer-seller split was nearly even at 212 buyers and 205 sellers.
The rest of the new-pool board was far less stable. adog, Rocco, GOONCAVE, and HIGHCAP each pushed roughly $584,000 to $708,000 in volume while sitting on about $2,200 of liquidity and falling 77% to 98% inside roughly one day. GANG held up better with a 10-hour-old pool, $563,815 in volume, and $4,478 in liquidity, but that is still extremely thin.
The takeaway is simple: new-pool volume by itself is not a quality signal. A pool can print large turnover numbers and still be too shallow to handle exits cleanly.
Biggest losers
The largest drop among established names was ANT, down 83.79% over 24 hours on $1.8 million in volume and $90.7k in liquidity. ABYSS lost 39.05% with $285.3k in volume and a much deeper $200.1k liquidity base, while FOREVER fell 38.72% on $458.7k in volume.
HMM and DELTA also sold off, down 33.5% and 29.87% respectively. Unlike most of the winners, these were not hours-old listings: their pools ranged from 147 hours old for ANT to 2,696 hours old for HMM. That suggests unwinds in existing positions, not just new-listing noise.
How to check a token before trading it
- Check liquidity depth first. A token with less than $50,000 in pool liquidity can move hard on relatively small orders.
- Check the pool age. If a pool is only a few hours old, big percentage gains are usually listing effects.
- Compare buyers, sellers, and trades. A buyer lead can support a move for a while, but balanced or seller-heavy flow often shows up before a reversal.
- Verify the contract on the explorer. Match the token address and pool address on Robinhood Chain's Blockscout before approving any swap.
- Look at the quote asset and route. WETH, USDG, and stock-token pairs can trade differently, and fragmented liquidity across multiple pools can change the effective price.
- Set slippage carefully and keep ETH for gas. Thin pools often need wider slippage, but wide settings also increase execution risk.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best-performing token on Robinhood Chain today?
On November 8, 2026, CLAUDIA was the top gainer in this tracked Robinhood Chain set, up 42,456.48% over 24 hours. Its pool was only 14 hours old, so the move reads as a listing effect more than a mature trend.
How do I buy tokens on Robinhood Chain?
Connect a compatible wallet such as MetaMask, Rabby, Coinbase Wallet, or another WalletConnect wallet, bridge assets in, and keep some ETH for gas because Robinhood Chain uses ETH for fees. Then swap on a DEX or aggregator such as RobinSwap, and check liquidity depth, pool age, and the token contract before trading.
Are four-digit gains on Robinhood Chain organic?
Usually not when the pool is younger than two days. On November 8, 2026, nine of the 10 top gainers were less than 24 hours old, so most of the extreme moves looked like listing effects.
Where can I verify a Robinhood Chain token contract?
Use Robinhood Chain's Blockscout explorer and match the token address with the pool address before approving a trade. That helps avoid copycat tokens and wrong-pair mistakes.
Sources
- Robinhood Chain: Built for RWA, Loved for Memes — CoinGecko coingecko.com
- Top Robinhood Chain Meme Coins by Market Cap — CoinGecko coingecko.com
- GlobalCoin ($GC) rug check on Robinhood Chain · Modus modus.builders
- $Telepawthy rug check on Robinhood Chain · Klaye klaye.ai
- Robinhood Chain: Built for onchain finance — Robinhood robinhood.com
Token prices, history and contracts · Network statistics · Bridge from Ethereum · Bridge from Base
Trade on Robinhood Chain
Swap any token on Robinhood Chain or bridge in from Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and more. Non-custodial, live quotes.
Not financial advice. Token prices on Robinhood Chain move fast and new pools can lose most of their value within hours. Figures reflect the moment of capture on November 8, 2026. This article was produced automatically by the RobinSwap editorial pipeline from live on-chain data and the public sources listed above. RobinSwap is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc.