Top 10 Robinhood Chain tokens today: September 16, 2026
Robinhood Chain on September 16, 2026 was a new-pool market: tracked DEX volume hit $1.22B while OKEY led with a 7,602% listing-effect surge.
Top 10 movers on Robinhood Chain
| # | Token | Price | 24h | 7d | 24h volume | Liquidity | Trades | Pool age | DEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OKEYOpenKey | $0.00218 | +7,602% | — | $17.42M | $552,085 | 14,601 | 12h | Uniswap V4 |
| 2 | GGLooping | $0.00227 | +4,066% | — | $4.63M | $137,477 | 10,878 | 18h | Pons V2 Dex |
| 3 | TRAINtokenization train | $0.000272 | +2,797% | — | $1.43M | $297,736 | 4,470 | 22h | Uniswap V4 |
| 4 | CHASEChase | $0.000265 | +2,633% | — | $1.29M | $90,828 | 4,742 | 3h | Uniswap V3 |
| 5 | musebookmusebook | $0.0000937 | +2,607% | — | $14.73M | $2.57M | 80,655 | 8h | Bankr |
| 6 | JENSENgJENSEN | $0.001 | +1,814% | — | $1.62M | $223,808 | 7,531 | 22h | Uniswap V4 |
| 7 | GERMANGerman Cat | $0.000871 | +600% | — | $971,408 | $63,450 | 4,732 | 25h | Uniswap V4 |
| 8 |  BETCould.Bet | $0.000248 | +354% | — | $822,587 | $43,390 | 2,527 | 21h | Pons V2 Dex |
| 9 |  XLX Link | $0.000849 | +245% | −71.3% | $2.31M | $73,821 | 11,998 | 3d | Pons V2 Dex |
| 10 | EXAGExecAgent | $0.0000926 | +240% | — | $7.33M | $79,034 | 5,811 | 7h | Uniswap V4 |
Data from GeckoTerminal, captured at 14:06 UTC on September 16, 2026. Volume and trades are summed across each token's tracked pools; price, liquidity and pool age come from its deepest pool. Only tokens with at least $10k liquidity and 100 trades in 24 hours qualify.
Token by token: what happened and possible catalysts
1OKEY OpenKey+7,602%
$0.00218 · vol $17.42M · liq $552,085 · 14,601 trades (3,425 buyers / 2,326 sellers) · mcap $2.95M
OKEY rose 7,602.43% in 24 hours on $17.4 million of volume, with 3,425 buyers versus 2,326 sellers and $552.1 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the pool is only 12 hours old, so this looks like a listing effect amplified by strong early order flow and decent launch liquidity. Risk is high because the pool is brand new.
2GG Looping+4,066%
$0.00227 · vol $4.63M · liq $137,477 · 10,878 trades (1,235 buyers / 1,088 sellers) · mcap $2.23M
GG rose 4,066.4% in 24 hours on $4.63 million of volume, with 1,235 buyers versus 1,088 sellers and $137.5 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the pool is 18 hours old, so the move reads more like fresh-listing repricing than a mature trend. Risk is high because the pool is brand new.
3TRAIN tokenization train+2,797%
$0.000272 · vol $1.43M · liq $297,736 · 4,470 trades (1,331 buyers / 899 sellers) · mcap $12,025
TRAIN rose 2,797.23% in 24 hours on $1.43 million of volume, with 1,331 buyers versus 899 sellers and $297.7 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; with a 22-hour-old pool and only 29 holders, this looks like a listing effect around a small-float token rather than broad adoption. Risk is high because the pool is brand new.
4CHASE Chase+2,633%
$0.000265 · vol $1.29M · liq $90,828 · 4,742 trades (1,292 buyers / 1,067 sellers) · mcap $177,776
CHASE rose 2,632.6% in 24 hours on $1.29 million of volume, with 1,292 buyers versus 1,067 sellers and $90.8 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; a 3-hour-old pool can print extreme percentages quickly, and the 1-hour change was already down 19.4%, which suggests fast churn after launch. Risk is high because the pool is brand new.
5musebook musebook+2,607%
$0.0000937 · vol $14.73M · liq $2.57M · 80,655 trades (4,252 buyers / 4,475 sellers) · mcap $9.68M
musebook rose 2,607.09% in 24 hours on $14.7 million of volume, with 4,252 buyers versus 4,475 sellers and $2.57 million of tracked liquidity across two pools. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the token's 8-hour age, 80,655 trades, and second USDG pool suggest rapid multi-pool discovery rather than a confirmed external catalyst. Risk is high because the pools are brand new.
6JENSEN gJENSEN+1,814%
$0.001 · vol $1.62M · liq $223,808 · 7,531 trades (1,097 buyers / 1,057 sellers) · mcap $533,065
JENSEN rose 1,814.18% in 24 hours on $1.62 million of volume, with 1,097 buyers versus 1,057 sellers and $223.8 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 22-hour pool age and NVDA quote asset suggest narrative trading around tokenized-stock tickers rather than verified project news. Risk is high because the pool is brand new.
7GERMAN German Cat+600%
$0.000871 · vol $971,408 · liq $63,450 · 4,732 trades (218 buyers / 203 sellers) · mcap $865,946
GERMAN rose 600.47% in 24 hours on $971.4 thousand of volume, with 218 buyers versus 203 sellers and $63.4 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; with a 25-hour-old pool quoted against COOK, the move looks driven by niche pair flow more than any documented announcement. Risk is high because the pool is brand new.
8BET Could.Bet+354%
$0.000248 · vol $822,587 · liq $43,390 · 2,527 trades (454 buyers / 490 sellers) · mcap $246,149
BET rose 354.05% in 24 hours on $822.6 thousand of volume, with 454 buyers versus 490 sellers and just $43.4 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 21-hour pool age points to a listing effect, and the seller count already slightly exceeds buyers despite the 24-hour gain. Risk is high because liquidity is under $50k and the pool is brand new.
9XL X Link+245%
$0.000849 · vol $2.31M · liq $73,821 · 11,998 trades (1,241 buyers / 1,455 sellers) · mcap $858,007
XL rose 244.78% in 24 hours on $2.31 million of volume, with 1,241 buyers versus 1,455 sellers and $73.8 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; unlike the newest movers, XL's pool is 68 hours old, so this looks more like a rebound after a 71.31% seven-day drawdown than a pure launch spike.
10EXAG ExecAgent+240%
$0.0000926 · vol $7.33M · liq $79,034 · 5,811 trades (2,009 buyers / 1,376 sellers) · mcap $92,259
EXAG rose 240.13% in 24 hours on $7.33 million of volume, with 2,009 buyers versus 1,376 sellers and $79.0 thousand of liquidity. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 7-hour pool age and 5,811 trades point to heavy first-day speculation, while the 6-hour change was down 85.4%, showing how quickly that flow reversed after launch. Risk is high because the pool is brand new.
Robinhood Chain market snapshot for September 16, 2026
Robinhood Chain stayed busy on September 16, 2026. GeckoTerminal-tracked pools showed $1.22 billion in 24-hour volume across 223 pools and 141 tokens, with 2,357,335 trades recorded at the 2026-09-16T14:06:54.980Z snapshot.
“Tracked” means the sum over the most active pools visible in the public feed, not the entire chain.
Uniswap V3 (Robinhood) led with $695.7 million across 45 pools. Uniswap V4 (Robinhood) added $309.8 million across 93 pools, while Ramses V3 (Robinhood) handled $74.0 million and Pons V2 Dex handled $40.0 million. The feed also showed 20+ new pools in the last 24 hours, and that count is capped.
What moved the market
The first clear pattern was how young the leaderboard was. Nine of the 10 top movers had pool ages under 48 hours, and several posted four-digit gains. On a chain this active, those extreme percentage moves are usually listing effects and first-day price discovery, not evidence of stable trend formation.
The second pattern was that chain-wide speculative activity remains high. CoinDesk reported on September 3 that Pons generated nearly $6 million in fees in 24 hours, with roughly 25,000 tokens launched on September 2 and about $544 million in daily trading volume. CoinDesk Research then said Robinhood Chain TVL reached about $757 million and daily DEX volume about $1.69 billion, which fits the still-heavy turnover visible in the tracked data for September 16. By September 14, The Block reported an analyst view that TVL was nearing $1 billion and daily DEX volume had reached $1.88 billion.
The third pattern was that tokenized stock tokens still anchor the chain even when they are not the biggest percentage winners. Among the highest-volume names, NVDA traded $46.1 million in 24 hours, SPY traded $38.0 million, SPCX traded $30.1 million, META traded $21.1 million, and GOOGL traded $18.7 million. The Block said Robinhood Chain had more than 190 stock tokens and $149.4 million in tokenized value as of September 4, which helps explain why stock-linked pairs remain a base layer of liquidity.
A smaller but notable theme was quote-asset variety. Several movers used WETH, but others were quoted against META, NVDA, COOK, or USDG. That matters because price action in those pools reflects not just demand for the token itself, but also demand for the quote asset used to reach it.
New pools worth watching
The cleanest contrast in the new-pool list was between scale and fragility. OKEY opened 12 hours before the snapshot and already handled $17.4 million with $552.1 thousand of liquidity. musebook reached $14.7 million across two pools with $2.57 million of tracked liquidity, which is unusually deep for an 8-hour-old token.
STANDARD stood out for a different reason. It was down 37.07% on the day, yet it still showed $15.6 million in volume and $13.54 million in liquidity in a 37-hour-old pool. That is far deeper than most fresh launches and may keep it relevant after the first wave of speculation cools.
There is also a basic contract-selection warning in this feed. Two different tokens used the symbol musebook on September 16, 2026, with very different prices and liquidity profiles. That is a reminder to verify the exact contract address before trading any new listing.
At the fragile end, FTUSD showed $3.67 million in volume against only $11.5 thousand of liquidity, and AXMT showed $3.66 million against just $7.6 thousand. Ratios like that can produce sharp candles in both directions and difficult exits.
Biggest losers
Losses were as violent as gains. WAIFU fell 87.73%, ZFORGE fell 86.65%, and HBET fell 81.87%, while SHRUB dropped 78.74% and DTF dropped 64%.
The important detail is that some of those drawdowns still came with heavy turnover. WAIFU traded $1.01 million and ZFORGE traded $1.85 million during their declines, which suggests active exits rather than an abandoned market. HBET was even thinner, with only $10.3 thousand of liquidity, while WAIFU and ZFORGE were both under $40 thousand, so relatively small orders could move price materially.
How to check a token before trading it
- Check pool age first. A pool that is 3, 8, or 12 hours old can show huge gains from its first trades alone.
- Compare liquidity with the size of the order. Pools under $50 thousand are fragile, and even six-figure pools can slip hard during fast rotations.
- Look at buyers, sellers, and trade count together. High volume with balanced participation is generally more informative than a move driven by a small group of wallets.
- Verify the exact contract on the official Blockscout explorer. This matters even more when duplicate symbols appear, as they did with musebook on September 16, 2026.
- Check the quote asset. A token priced against META, NVDA, COOK, or another volatile asset can move even if the base token is doing little on its own.
- Set slippage deliberately. Tight slippage may fail in fast markets, but loose slippage can turn a small trade into an expensive fill.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best-performing token on Robinhood Chain today?
On September 16, 2026, OKEY was the best-performing token in the mover list, up 7,602.43% in 24 hours. Its main pool was only 12 hours old, so the move looks like a listing effect rather than a mature trend.
How do I buy tokens on Robinhood Chain?
Use an EVM wallet such as MetaMask, Rabby, Coinbase Wallet, or a WalletConnect wallet, switch to Robinhood Chain, and keep ETH in the wallet for gas. Then swap on a DEX or aggregator such as RobinSwap, but check the exact contract, pool age, and liquidity before placing an order.
Is Robinhood Chain an Ethereum Layer 2?
Yes. Robinhood Chain is an Ethereum Layer 2 built on Arbitrum Orbit technology. Its chain ID is 4663, and gas is paid in ETH.
Why are some Robinhood Chain tokens up thousands of percent in a day?
On September 16, 2026, nine of the 10 top movers had pool ages under 48 hours. In that setup, very large percentage gains usually come from first-day price discovery and low float, not established demand.
Sources
Trade on Robinhood Chain
Swap any token on Robinhood Chain or bridge in from Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and more. Non-custodial, live quotes.
Not financial advice. Token prices on Robinhood Chain move fast and new pools can lose most of their value within hours. Figures reflect the moment of capture on September 16, 2026. This article was produced automatically by the RobinSwap editorial pipeline from live on-chain data and the public sources listed above. RobinSwap is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc.