Top 10 Robinhood Chain tokens today: September 18, 2026
Robinhood Chain on September 18, 2026 saw $1.15B in tracked volume as brand-new pools, not older names, drove most top-10 token gains.
Top 10 movers on Robinhood Chain
| # | Token | Price | 24h | 7d | 24h volume | Liquidity | Trades | Pool age | DEX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  ADArtificial Doge | $0.00141 | +94,494% | — | $1.5M | $103,084 | 11,350 | 20h | Uniswap V4 |
| 2 | SOHSphere of Humanity | $0.000862 | +34,992% | — | $974,363 | $98,657 | 3,743 | 17h | Uniswap V2 |
| 3 | CPUCat Processing Unit | $0.00111 | +5,228% | +3,984% | $3.73M | $333,831 | 38,381 | 8d | Bankr |
| 4 | AGIARTIFICIAL GOD INTELLIGENCE | $0.00012 | +5,013% | — | $3.67M | $43,861 | 7,018 | 9h | Uniswap V2 |
| 5 | PAWSINUUNISWAP | $0.000599 | +2,656% | — | $3.62M | $216,020 | 14,254 | 16h | Bankr |
| 6 | VERITYVerity | $0.00022 | +1,614% | — | $1.89M | $88,255 | 7,049 | 4h | Uniswap V4 |
| 7 | RightsLayerRightsLayer | $0.00041 | +1,534% | — | $4.72M | $317,496 | 4,650 | 12h | Uniswap V4 |
| 8 | COLOSSEUMColosseum | $0.000182 | +1,371% | — | $1.29M | $83,167 | 6,351 | 11h | Uniswap V4 |
| 9 |  DAMModam | $0.000651 | +1,092% | — | $2.2M | $49,155 | 14,690 | 15h | Pons V2 Dex |
| 10 | ACTRActionRail | $0.000295 | +906% | — | $3.96M | $220,271 | 3,818 | 9h | Uniswap V4 |
Data from GeckoTerminal, captured at 13:30 UTC on September 18, 2026. Volume and trades are summed across each token's tracked pools; price, liquidity and pool age come from its deepest pool. Only tokens with at least $10k liquidity and 100 trades in 24 hours qualify.
Token by token: what happened and possible catalysts
1AD Artificial Doge+94,494%
$0.00141 · vol $1.5M · liq $103,084 · 11,350 trades (1,922 buyers / 2,035 sellers) · mcap $1.37M
AD jumped 94,494% in 24 hours on $1.5M volume, with 1,922 buyers and 2,035 sellers against about $103.1k liquidity. Given the pool is only 20 hours old, that kind of move reads as a listing effect more than an established trend. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the official site frames AD as an AI-doge meme token, and the on-chain pattern looks like a fresh-launch scramble with 11.4k trades. Risk note: the pool is only 20 hours old.
2SOH Sphere of Humanity+34,992%
$0.000862 · vol $974,363 · liq $98,657 · 3,743 trades (207 buyers / 201 sellers) · mcap $86
SOH rose 34,992% in 24 hours on $974.4k volume, with 207 buyers and 201 sellers against about $98.7k liquidity. The very even buyer-seller split and 17-hour pool age look more like first-day price discovery than a confirmed trend. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; on-chain activity suggests a brand-new listing attracting speculative flow rather than a news-driven breakout. Risk note: the pool is only 17 hours old.
3CPU Cat Processing Unit+5,228%
$0.00111 · vol $3.73M · liq $333,831 · 38,381 trades (1,497 buyers / 1,498 sellers) · mcap $1.21M
CPU gained 5,228% over 24 hours on $3.7M volume, with 1,497 buyers and 1,498 sellers against about $333.8k liquidity. It also remains up 3,984% over seven days, so this is one of the few movers with momentum lasting beyond the first day. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the project site describes a Robinhood Chain memecoin paired with tokenized Intel, and the on-chain picture is sustained speculative trading rather than a single launch spike.
4AGI ARTIFICIAL GOD INTELLIGENCE+5,013%
$0.00012 · vol $3.67M · liq $43,861 · 7,018 trades (419 buyers / 356 sellers) · mcap $3,188
AGI was still up 5,013% over 24 hours on $3.7M volume, with 419 buyers and 356 sellers against only about $43.9k liquidity. But the shorter windows were brutal, down 97.47% in six hours and 86.03% in one hour, which suggests a sharp launch spike already reversed. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the 9-hour pool age and heavy turnover point to a listing effect, not an organic rally. Risk note: liquidity is only about $43.9k and the pool is 9 hours old.
5PAWSINU UNISWAP+2,656%
$0.000599 · vol $3.62M · liq $216,020 · 14,254 trades (1,105 buyers / 1,041 sellers) · mcap $583,598
PAWSINU climbed 2,656% in 24 hours on $3.6M volume, with 1,105 buyers and 1,041 sellers against about $216k liquidity. The two-way flow was active, but the pool is only 16 hours old, so the move still fits a launch-phase pattern. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the UNI-quoted pair and meme branding suggest narrative speculation around a fresh listing. Risk note: the pool is only 16 hours old.
6VERITY Verity+1,614%
$0.00022 · vol $1.89M · liq $88,255 · 7,049 trades (1,637 buyers / 1,520 sellers) · mcap $149,325
VERITY gained 1,614% in 24 hours on $1.9M volume, with 1,637 buyers and 1,520 sellers against about $88.3k liquidity. Because the pool is only 4 hours old, the move is best treated as first-listing volatility. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; the social reference attached to the token is weak evidence, so the cleaner reading is a fast new-pool launch with active two-way flow. Risk note: the pool is only 4 hours old.
7RightsLayer RightsLayer+1,534%
$0.00041 · vol $4.72M · liq $317,496 · 4,650 trades (1,833 buyers / 1,138 sellers) · mcap $50,550
RightsLayer rose 1,534% in 24 hours on $4.7M volume, with 1,833 buyers and 1,138 sellers against about $317.5k liquidity. That buyer lead is stronger than most of the list, but the pool is still only 12 hours old. Possible catalysts: The official site frames RightsLayer as an onchain digital-rights concept, but no dated announcement or recent social catalyst was found, so early narrative trading is the main on-chain explanation. Risk note: the pool is only 12 hours old.
8COLOSSEUM Colosseum+1,371%
$0.000182 · vol $1.29M · liq $83,167 · 6,351 trades (1,818 buyers / 1,620 sellers) · mcap $181,799
COLOSSEUM advanced 1,371% in 24 hours on $1.3M volume, with 1,818 buyers and 1,620 sellers against about $83.2k liquidity. The activity was broad, but not especially one-sided, which is typical of speculative churn in a fresh pool. Possible catalysts: No news coverage found; with only listing pages visible, the most likely driver is standard launch-day momentum. Risk note: the pool is only 11 hours old.
9DAM Modam+1,092%
$0.000651 · vol $2.2M · liq $49,155 · 14,690 trades (1,619 buyers / 1,728 sellers) · mcap $793,020
DAM gained 1,092% in 24 hours on $2.2M volume, with 1,619 buyers and 1,728 sellers against about $49.2k liquidity. Sellers slightly outnumbered buyers despite the large daily gain, which hints at heavy rotation inside a very young market. Possible catalysts: The official site describes DAM as a compute-network token for AI access, but no dated catalyst was found; the NVDA-quoted pool likely added narrative appeal. Risk note: liquidity is only about $49.2k and the pool is 15 hours old.
10ACTR ActionRail+906%
$0.000295 · vol $3.96M · liq $220,271 · 3,818 trades (1,506 buyers / 1,015 sellers) · mcap $57,908
ACTR rose 906% in 24 hours on $4.0M volume, with 1,506 buyers and 1,015 sellers against about $220.3k liquidity. The 491-buyer lead stands out, although the pool is still only 9 hours old. Possible catalysts: The official site positions ActionRail as infrastructure for tokenized-equity corporate actions, but no dated announcement was found, so the move looks tied to launch interest and the broader stock-token culture on Robinhood Chain. Risk note: the pool is only 9 hours old.
Robinhood Chain market snapshot for September 18, 2026
As of 13:30 UTC on September 18, 2026, Robinhood Chain had 222 tracked pools and 137 tracked tokens in this dataset, with $1.15 billion in 24-hour volume and 2.2 million trades. The feed also showed 20+ new pools in the last 24 hours, though that new-pool count was capped.
Here, "tracked" means the public GeckoTerminal pool set used in this report, not every pool on the chain.
The venue split stayed concentrated:
- Uniswap V3 (Robinhood): $643.8M across 53 pools
- Uniswap V4 (Robinhood): $277.5M across 85 pools
- Ramses V3 (Robinhood): $56.8M across 8 pools
- Uniswap V2 (Robinhood): $49.6M across 11 pools
- Up V3: $37.3M across 6 pools
- Pons V2 Dex: $30.7M across 14 pools
- Bankr (Robinhood): $25.7M across 13 pools
Together, Uniswap V3 and Uniswap V4 handled about $921.3M of tracked volume. That helps explain why most of the biggest daily movers were concentrated in those pool types even when the narratives differed.
What moved the market
The first theme was simple: most of the leaderboard was brand new. Nine of the 10 top movers had pools younger than 24 hours, so the four-digit and five-digit gains should be read mainly as listing effects and thin initial price discovery, not organic rallies.
The second theme was an AI-and-automation cluster. Artificial Doge frames AD as an AI-doge meme token, while Modam describes DAM as a decentralized compute token. RightsLayer and ActionRail lean toward infrastructure narratives instead of pure memes. The important limit is that RESEARCH found no dated, credible catalyst for any of those names in the last seven days.
A third theme was quote-asset experimentation. Not every mover was paired against WETH. CPU traded against INTC, DAM against NVDA, and one PAWSINU winner pool against UNI. That can amplify volatility because traders are taking exposure to both the base token and the quote asset at once.
That pattern also fits the broader setup of Robinhood Chain, which is built to support a mix of meme tokens, stablecoin pairs, and tokenized stock tokens in the same DEX environment. On September 18, 2026, that mix looked less like a single market narrative and more like a chain-wide burst of fresh listings competing for flow.
The last theme was the lack of confirmed external news. With no chain-level news items in RESEARCH and no dated project announcements attached to the big movers, on-chain behavior matters more than marketing copy. In practice, that means volume, buyer-seller balance, pool age, and liquidity depth carry more weight than the token name.
New pools worth watching
Fresh volume was not limited to the top-10 movers.
- MFEED stood out for combining $6.1M in volume with about $231.3k in liquidity in a 24-hour-old pool. That is still a new market, but it is less fragile than the thinnest launches.
- RightsLayer and ACTR also looked cleaner than average among new names because each paired multi-million-dollar volume with more than $220k in liquidity.
- KPORT had $5.9M in volume with roughly $67.8k in liquidity, which is enough depth to watch but still thin enough to move hard.
- The weakest setups were PAWSINU on Uniswap V2 and Fly, which each pushed roughly $9.7M to $10.2M in volume with less than $9k of liquidity.
1000X is the cautionary example. It was one of the most active new pools by volume, yet it also showed up among the biggest losers after collapsing 98.01% in 24 hours. High turnover in a fresh pool does not mean the market has stabilized.
Biggest losers
Losses were just as violent as gains. 1000X fell 98.01% in an 18-hour-old pool with only about $10.7k liquidity, and FOMOBAG dropped 83.77% with just $32.5k liquidity. JEV and one PAWSINU pool also lost about 69% to 70% in pools younger than 28 hours.
The outlier was WALLET. Unlike the brand-new microcaps, WALLET is an older pool set with about $1.7M in liquidity, yet it still fell 70.29% on $23.4M volume. That suggests the day's risk was not limited to brand-new launches; even established meme names could see heavy unwinds.
How to check a token before trading it
- Compare liquidity with your order size. A pool with $10k to $50k in liquidity can move sharply on modest trades.
- Check pool age first. Anything launched in the last 48 hours is usually still in price discovery, so extreme gains and losses are often listing effects.
- Look at buyers, sellers, and total trades together. A token with thousands of trades but a balanced buyer-seller count can be pure churn rather than steady accumulation.
- Verify the contract on the chain explorer and make sure the ticker matches the exact pool you intend to trade. Duplicate names are common in fast markets.
- Note the quote asset. A WETH pair, a stablecoin pair, and a tokenized-stock pair can behave very differently even when the base token name looks familiar.
- Set slippage deliberately instead of accepting a default. Thin pools and fast launches can produce bad fills if slippage is too loose.
Frequently asked questions
What is the best-performing token on Robinhood Chain today?
On September 18, 2026, AD was the best-performing token in this top-movers set on Robinhood Chain, up 94,494.49% over 24 hours. Its pool was only 20 hours old, so the move should be treated as a launch effect rather than a mature trend.
Why are Robinhood Chain token gains so large on September 18, 2026?
Because nine of the top 10 movers had pools younger than 24 hours. On brand-new pools, huge percentage changes often come from initial listing volatility and thin early liquidity, not from established demand.
How do I buy tokens on Robinhood Chain?
Use a self-custody wallet such as MetaMask, Rabby, Coinbase Wallet, or another WalletConnect wallet, bridge ETH to Robinhood Chain for gas, then swap on a DEX or aggregator such as RobinSwap. Check the contract address, pool age, liquidity, and slippage settings before placing the trade.
Are Robinhood Chain tokenized stocks the same as meme tokens?
No. Tokens whose names end with "• Robinhood Token" are tokenized stock tokens issued by Robinhood that trade in DEX pools, while meme tokens are separate on-chain assets and are often much newer and less liquid.
Sources
- Artificial Doge artificial-doge.com
- Modam modam.tech
- RightsLayer rightslayer.shop
- ActionRail actionrail.shop
- Robinhood Chain overview docs.robinhood.com
Trade on Robinhood Chain
Swap any token on Robinhood Chain or bridge in from Ethereum, Base, Arbitrum and more. Non-custodial, live quotes.
Not financial advice. Token prices on Robinhood Chain move fast and new pools can lose most of their value within hours. Figures reflect the moment of capture on September 18, 2026. This article was produced automatically by the RobinSwap editorial pipeline from live on-chain data and the public sources listed above. RobinSwap is not affiliated with Robinhood Markets, Inc.